Romans 2:26 If then the uncircumcised keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be considered for circumcision,

ABP_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437 If G3767 then G3588 the G203 uncircumcised G3588 [²the G1345 ³ordinances G3588 ⁴of the G3551 ⁵law G5442 ¹keep], G3780 shall not G3588 G203 his uncircumcision G1473 G1519 [²for G4061 ³circumcision G3049 ¹be considered],

ABP_GRK⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437 εάν G3767 ούν G3588 η G203 ακροβυστία G3588 τα G1345 δικαιώματα G3588 του G3551 νόμου G5442 φυλάσση G3780 ουχί G3588 η G203 ακροβυστία αυτού G1473 G1519 εις G4061 περιτομήν G3049 λογισθήσεται

Stephanus⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ εαν ουν η ακροβυστια τα δικαιωματα του νομου φυλασση ουχι η ακροβυστια αυτου εις περιτομην λογισθησεται

LXX_WH⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437 COND εαν G3767 CONJ ουν G3588 T-NSF η G203 N-NSF ακροβυστια G3588 T-APN τα G1345 N-APN δικαιωματα G3588 T-GSM του G3551 N-GSM νομου G5442 [G5725] V-PAS-3S φυλασση G3756 PRT-N ουχ G3588 T-NSF η G203 N-NSF ακροβυστια G846 P-GSM αυτου G1519 PREP εις G4061 N-ASF περιτομην G3049 [G5701] V-FPI-3S λογισθησεται

Tischendorf⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437 COND ἐὰν G3767 CONJ οὖν G3588 T-NSF ἡ G203 N-NSF ἀκροβυστία G3588 T-APN τὰ G1345 N-APN δικαιώματα G3588 T-GSM τοῦ G3551 N-GSM νόμου G5442 V-PAS-3S φυλάσσῃ, G3756 PRT-N οὐχ G3588 T-NSF ἡ G203 N-NSF ἀκροβυστία G846 P-GSM αὐτοῦ G1519 PREP εἰς G4061 N-ASF περιτομὴν G3049 V-FPI-3S λογισθήσεται;

Tregelles⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ ἐὰν οὖν ἡ ἀκροβυστία τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου φυλάσσῃ, οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται;

TR⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437 COND εαν G3767 CONJ ουν G3588 T-NSF η G203 N-NSF ακροβυστια G3588 T-APN τα G1345 N-APN δικαιωματα G3588 T-GSM του G3551 N-GSM νομου G5442 (G5725) V-PAS-3S φυλασση G3780 PRT-I ουχι G3588 T-NSF η G203 N-NSF ακροβυστια G846 P-GSM αυτου G1519 PREP εις G4061 N-ASF περιτομην G3049 (G5701) V-FPI-3S λογισθησεται

Nestle⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ ἐὰν οὖν ἡ ἀκροβυστία τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου φυλάσσῃ, οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται;

RP⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437CONDεανG3767CONJουνG3588T-NSFηG203N-NSFακροβυστιαG3588T-APNταG1345N-APNδικαιωματαG3588T-GSMτουG3551N-GSMνομουG5442 [G5725]V-PAS-3SφυλασσηG3780PRT-IουχιG3588T-NSFηG203N-NSFακροβυστιαG846P-GSMαυτουG1519PREPειvG4061N-ASFπεριτομηνG3049 [G5701]V-FPI-3Sλογισθησεται

SBLGNT⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ ἐὰν οὖν ἡ ἀκροβυστία τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου φυλάσσῃ, ⸀οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται;

f35⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ εαν ουν η ακροβυστια τα δικαιωματα του νομου φυλασση ουχι η ακροβυστια αυτου εις περιτομην λογισθησεται

IGNT⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437 εαν If G3767 ουν Therefore G3588 η The G203 ακροβυστια Uncircumcision G3588 τα The G1345 δικαιωματα Requirements G3588 του Of The G3551 νομου Law G5442 (G5725) φυλασση Keep G3780 ουχι Not G3588 η His G203 ακροβυστια G846 αυτου Uncircumcision G1519 εις For G4061 περιτομην Circumcision G3049 (G5701) λογισθησεται Shall Be Reckoned?

ACVI⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G3767 CONJ ουν Therefore G1437 COND εαν If G3588 T-NSF η Tha G203 N-NSF ακροβυστια Uncircumcision G5442 V-PAS-3S φυλασση Keeps G3588 T-APN τα Thes G1345 N-APN δικαιωματα Ordinances G3588 T-GSM του Of Tho G3551 N-GSM νομου Law G3780 PRT-I ουχι Not? G3588 T-NSF η Tha G203 N-NSF ακροβυστια Uncircumcision G846 P-GSM αυτου Of Him G3049 V-FPI-3S λογισθησεται Will Be Considered G1519 PREP εις For G4061 N-ASF περιτομην Circumcision

new⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G3767 Therefore G1437 if G203 the uncircumcision G5442 [G5725] keepeth G1345 the righteousness G3551 of the law, G3049 0 shall G3780 not G846 his G203 uncircumcision G3049 [G5701] be counted G1519 for G4061 circumcision?

Vulgate⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ si igitur praeputium iustitias legis custodiat nonne praeputium illius in circumcisionem reputabitur

Clementine_Vulgate⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Si igitur præputium justitias legis custodiat, nonne præputium illius in circumcisionem reputabitur?

Wycliffe⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therfor if prepucie kepe the riytwisnessis of the lawe, whethir his prepucie schal not be arettid in to circumcisioun?

Tyndale⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therfore if the vncircumcised kepe the ryght thinges contayned in the lawe: shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Coverdale⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therfore yf the vncircumcision kepe the righte thinges conteyned in the lawe, shal not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

MSTC⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if the uncircumcised keep the right things contained in the law: shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Matthew⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therfore yf the vncircumcised kepe the right thynges conteyned in the lawe: shall not hys vncircumcysyon be counted for circumcision?

Great⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therfore, yf the vncircumcised kepe the ryght thynges contayned in the lawe, shall not his vncircumcisyon be counted for circumcisyon?

Geneva⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if the vncircumcision keepe the ordinances of the Lawe, shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Bishops⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if the vncircumcisio kepe the ordinaunces of the law, shall not his vncircumcisio be counted for circumcisio

DouayRheims⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If then, the uncircumcised keep the justices of the law, shall not this uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

KJV⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

KJV_Cambridge⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

KJV_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G3767 Therefore G1437 if G203 the uncircumcision G5442 keep [G5725] G1345 the righteousness G3551 of the law G3049 , shall G3780 not G846 his G203 uncircumcision G3049 be counted [G5701] G1519 for G4061 circumcision?

Mace⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ if therefore an uncircumcised Gentile keep the moral precepts contained in the law, shall not he be reckon'd, as if he were circumcised?

Whiston⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore, if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Wesley⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Worsley⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if the uncircumcised keep the righteous precepts of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be accounted to him for circumcision?

Haweis⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If then the uncircumcision observe the righteous judgments of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be accounted for circumcision?

Thomson⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If then the uncircumcision keep the moral precepts of the law, shall not such a one's uncircumcision be accounted circumcision?

Webster⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore, if the uncircumcision keepeth the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Webster_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G3767 Therefore G1437 if G203 the uncircumcision G5442 [G5725] keepeth G1345 the righteousness G3551 of the law G3049 0 , shall G3780 not G846 his G203 uncircumcision G3049 [G5701] be counted G1519 for G4061 circumcision?

Living_Oracles⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ And if the uncircumcision keep the precepts of the law, will not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Etheridge⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ But if the uncircumcision shall keep the commandment of the law, is not uncircumcisedness reckoned to him (as) circumcision?

Murdock⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ And if uncircumcision should keep the precepts of the law, would not that uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?

Sawyer⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If therefore the uncircumcision keeps the ordinances of the law, shall not its uncircumcision be accounted for circumcision?

Diaglott⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If therefore the uncircumcision the ordinances of the law may keep, not the uncircumcision of him for circumcision will be counted?

ABU⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If then the uncircumcision keep the requirements of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Anderson⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If, then, he who is uncircumcised keeps the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Noyes⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If then he who is uncircumcised keep the precepts of the Law, shall not he though uncircumcised be regarded as circumcised?

YLT⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If, therefore the uncircumcision the righteousness of the law may keep, shall not his uncircumcision for circumcision be reckoned?

JuliaSmith⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if uncircumcision watch the justification of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?

Darby⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If therefore the uncircumcision keep the requirements of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision,

ERV⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If therefore the uncircumcision keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?

ASV⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If therefore the uncircumcision keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?

ASV_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437 If G3767 therefore G203 the uncircumcision G5442 keep G1345 the ordinances G3551 of the law, G3780 shall not G846 his G203 uncircumcision G3049 be reckoned G1519 for G4061 circumcision?

JPS_ASV_Byz⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If therefore the uncircumcision keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?

Rotherham⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If then, the uncircumcision, be guarding the righteous requirement of the law, shall not, his uncircumcision, as circumcision be reckoned?––

Twentieth_Century⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If, then, an uncircumcised man pays regard to the requirements of the Law, will not he, although not circumcised, be regarded by God as if he were?

Godbey⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Then if uncircumcision may keep the righteousness of the law, will not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

WNT⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ In the same way if an uncircumcised man pays attention to the just requirements of the Law, shall not his lack of circumcision be overlooked, and,

Worrell⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If, therefore, the uncircumcision keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision he reckoned for circumcision?

Moffatt⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ (If then the uncircumcised observe the requirements of the Law, shall not their uncircumcision be reckoned equivalent to circumcision?

Goodspeed⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ So if people who are uncircumcised observe the requirements of the Law, will they not be treated as though they were circumcised?

Riverside⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If an uncircumcised man keeps the requirements of the Law, shall not his uncircumcision be credited for circumcision?

MNT⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ So if the uncircumcised keeps the ordinance of the Law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned equivalent to circumcision.

Lamsa⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore, if the uncircumcision keep the statutes of the law, behold would not the uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

CLV⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If the Uncircumcision, then, should be maintaining the just requirements of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?

Williams⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ So if the uncircumcised heathen man observes the just demands of the law, will he not be counted as though he were a Jew?

BBE⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If those who have not circumcision keep the rules of the law, will it not be credited to them as circumcision?

MKJV⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If then the uncircumcision keeps the ordinances of the Law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

LITV⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If, then, the uncircumcision keeps the demands of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

ECB⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ So whenever the uncircumcision guards the judgment of the torah, is not indeed his uncircumcision reckoned to circumcision?

AUV⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ So, if an uncircumcised person [i.e., a Gentile] obeys [the rest of] the requirements of the law, will not the fact that he is not circumcised be considered [by God] as though he were?

ACV⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If therefore a man of uncircumcision keeps the ordinances of the law, will not his uncircumcision be considered circumcision?

Common⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ So, if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?

WEB⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If therefore the uncircumcised keep the ordinances of the law, won’t his uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?

WEB_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437 If G3767 therefore G203 the uncircumcised G5442 keep G1345 the ordinances G3551 of the law, G3780 won't G846 his G203 uncircumcision G3049 be accounted G1519 as G4061 circumcision?

NHEB⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If therefore the uncircumcised keep the requirements of the law, won't his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision?

AKJV⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

AKJV_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G3767 Therefore G1437 if G203 the uncircumcision G5442 keep G1345 the righteousness G3551 of the law, G203 shall not his uncircumcision G3049 be counted G4061 for circumcision?

KJC⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

KJ2000⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if the uncircumcision keeps the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

UKJV⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

RKJNT⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore, if the uncircumcised keeps the requirements of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision?

TKJU⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if the uncircumcised keeps the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision?

CKJV_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G3767 Therefore G1437 if G203 the uncircumcision G5442 keep G1345 the righteousness G3551 of the law, G3780 shall not G846 his G203 uncircumcision G3049 be counted G1519 for G4061 circumcision?

RYLT⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If, therefore the uncircumcision the righteousness of the law may keep, shall not his uncircumcision for circumcision be reckoned?

EJ2000⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if the uncircumcised keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his foreskin be counted for circumcision?

CAB⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore, if a Gentile keeps the righteous requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

WPNT⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ So if the uncircumcised keeps the righteous requirements of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision?

JMNT⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore, if the Uncircumcision (= non-Jews) should be habitually on watch to guard (have in keeping and maintain) the effects of justice and equity (the results of being pointed in the right direction; the fair and equitable dealings; the acts which result from what is right) of or from the Law (= customs from neighbor-based equity), will not his uncircumcision continue to be logically considered and accounted (reckoned; calculated) into circumcision (or: credited to his account for circumcision)?

NSB⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If therefore someone not circumcised obeys the requirements of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be considered circumcision?

ISV⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ So if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the requirements of the Law, his uncircumcision will be regarded as circumcision, won’t it?

LEB⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore, if the uncircumcised person follows the requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be credited for circumcision?

BGB⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ ἐὰν οὖν ἡ ἀκροβυστία τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου φυλάσσῃ, οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται;

BIB⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ ἐὰν (If) οὖν (therefore) ἡ (the) ἀκροβυστία (uncircumcision), τὰ (the) δικαιώματα (requirements) τοῦ (of the) νόμου (law) φυλάσσῃ (keeps), οὐχ (not) ἡ (the) ἀκροβυστία (uncircumcision) αὐτοῦ (of him) εἰς (for) περιτομὴν (circumcision) λογισθήσεται (will be reckoned)?

BLB⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore if the uncircumcision keeps the requirements of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?

BSB⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If a man who is not circumcised keeps the requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?

MSB⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ If a man who is not circumcised keeps the requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?

MLV⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Therefore, if the uncircumcision are observing the ordinances of the law, will his uncircumcision not be counted toward circumcision?

VIN⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ So if people who are uncircumcised observe the requirements of the Law, will they not be treated as though they were circumcised?

Luther1545⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ So nun die Vorhaut das Recht im Gesetz hält, meinest du nicht, daß seine Vorhaut werde für eine Beschneidung gerechnet?

Luther1545_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437 So G3767 nun G1345 die Vorhaut das Recht im Gesetz G5442 hält G3049 , meinest du G3780 nicht G846 , daß seine G1519 Vorhaut werde für G4061 eine Beschneidung G3049 gerechnet ?

Luther1912⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ So nun der Unbeschnittene das Gesetz hält, meinst du nicht, daß da der Unbeschnittene werde für einen Beschnittenen gerechnet?

Luther1912_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437 So G3767 nun G203 der Unbeschnittene G1345 das Recht G3551 im Gesetz G5442 hält G3049 , meinst G3780 du nicht G846 , daß da der G203 Unbeschnittene G3049 werde G1519 für G4061 einen Beschnittenen G3049 gerechnet ?

ELB1871⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Wenn nun die Vorhaut die Rechte des Gesetzes beobachtet, wird nicht seine Vorhaut für Beschneidung gerechnet werden,

ELB1871_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437 Wenn G3767 nun G203 die Vorhaut G1345 die Rechte G3551 des Gesetzes G5442 beobachtet, G3049 wird G3780 nicht G846 seine G203 Vorhaut G1519 für G4061 Beschneidung G3049 gerechnet werden,

ELB1905⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Wenn nun die Vorhaut die Rechte des Gesetzes beobachtet, wird nicht seine Vorhaut für Beschneidung gerechnet werden,

ELB1905_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437 Wenn G3767 nun G203 die Vorhaut G1345 die Rechte G3551 des Gesetzes G5442 beobachtet G3049 , wird G3780 nicht G846 seine G203 Vorhaut G1519 für G4061 Beschneidung G3049 gerechnet werden,

DSV⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Indien dan de voorhuid de rechten der wet bewaart, zal niet zijn voorhuid tot een besnijdenis gerekend worden?

DSV_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437 Indien G3767 dan G203 de voorhuid G1345 de rechten G3551 der wet G5442 G5725 bewaart G3780 , zal niet G846 zijn G203 voorhuid G1519 tot G4061 een besnijdenis G3049 G5701 gerekend worden?

DarbyFR⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Si donc l'incirconcision garde les exigences de la loi, son incirconcision ne sera-t-elle pas comptée pour circoncision;

Martin⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Mais si celui qui a le prépuce garde les ordonnances de la Loi, son prépuce ne lui sera-t-il point réputé pour Circoncision ?

Segond⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Si donc l'incirconcis observe les ordonnances de la loi, son incirconcision ne sera-t-elle pas tenue pour circoncision?

Segond_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G1437 Si G3767 donc G203 l’incirconcis G5442 observe G5725 G1345 les ordonnances G3551 de la loi G846 , son G203 incirconcision G3780 ne sera-t-elle pas G3049 tenue G5701 G1519 pour G4061 circoncision ?

SE⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ De manera que, si el incircunciso guardare las justicias de la ley, ¿no será tenido su prepucio por circuncisión?

ReinaValera⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ De manera que, si el incircunciso guardare las justicias de la ley, ¿no será tenida su incircuncisión por circuncisión?

JBS⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ De manera que, si el incircunciso guardare las justicias de la ley, ¿no será tenido su prepucio por circuncisión?

Albanian⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Prandaj në qoftë se një i parrethprerë respekton statutet e ligjit, a nuk do të çmohet parrethprerja e tij si rrethprerje?

RST⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Итак, если необрезанный соблюдает постановления закона, то его необрезание не вменится ли ему в обрезание?

Peshitta⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ ܐܢ ܗܘ ܕܝܢ ܕܥܘܪܠܘܬܐ ܬܛܪ ܦܘܩܕܢܗ ܕܢܡܘܤܐ ܠܐ ܗܐ ܥܘܪܠܘܬܐ ܡܬܚܫܒܐ ܠܗ ܓܙܘܪܬܐ ܀

Arabic⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ اذا ان كان الاغرل يحفظ احكام الناموس أفما تحسب غرلته ختانا.

Amharic⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ እንግዲህ ያልተገረዘ ሰው የሕግን ሥርዓት ቢጠብቅ አለመገረዙ እንደ መገረዝ ሆኖ አይቈጠርለትምን?

Armenian⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Ուրեմն եթէ անթլփատը պահէ Օրէնքին արդարութիւնը, միթէ թլփատութիւն պիտի չսեպուի՞ անոր անթլփատութիւնը,

Basque⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Bada baldin preputioac Leguearen ordenançác beguira baditza, haren preputioa ezta circoncisionetan estimaturen?

Bulgarian⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ И така, ако необрязаният пази наредбите на закона, няма ли неговото необрязване да му се счете за обрязване?

Croatian⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Ako dakle neobrezani opslužuje propise Zakona, neće li se njegovo neobrezanje smatrati obrezanjem?

BKR⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ A protož jestližeť by neobřízka ostříhala práv Zákona, zdaliž nebude počtena neobřízka jejich za obřízku?

Danish⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Dersom nu Forhuden holder Lovens Bud, mon da ikke hans Forhud regnes som Omskærelse?

CUV⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ 所以那未受割禮的，若遵守律法的條例，他雖然未受割禮，豈不算是有割禮麼？

CUV_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G3767 所以 G203 那未受割禮的 G1437 ，若 G5442 遵守 G3551 律法的 G1345 條例 G846 ，他 G203 雖然未受割禮 G3780 ，豈不 G3049 算 G1519 是 G4061 有割禮麼？

CUVS⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ 所以那未受割礼的，若遵守律法的条例，他虽然未受割礼，岂不算是冇割礼么？

CUVS_Strongs⁽ⁱ⁾

26 G3767 所以 G203 那未受割礼的 G1437 ，若 G5442 遵守 G3551 律法的 G1345 条例 G846 ，他 G203 虽然未受割礼 G3780 ，岂不 G3049 算 G1519 是 G4061 有割礼么？

Esperanto⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Se do necirkumcidulo plenumas la ordonojn de la legxo, cxu lia necirkumcido ne kalkuligxos kiel cirkumcido?

Estonian⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Kui nüüd ümberlõikamatu peab käsu nõudmisi, eks siis tema eesnahka peeta ümberlõikamiseks?

Finnish⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Jos siis esinahka lain oikeuden pitää, eikö hänen esinahkansa pidä luettaman hänelle ympärileikkaukseksi?

FinnishPR⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Jos siis ympärileikkaamaton noudattaa lain säädöksiä, eikö hänen ympärileikkaamattomuutensa ole luettava ympärileikkaukseksi?

Haitian⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Lè yon moun lòt nasyon ki pa sikonsi fè sa lalwa a mande, èske Bondye p'ap gade li tankou yon moun ki sikonsi?

Hungarian⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Ha tehát a körülmetéletlen pogány megtartja a törvénynek parancsolatait, az õ körülmetéletlensége nem körülmetélkedésül tulajdoníttatik-é néki?

Indonesian⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Kalau seorang bukan Yahudi yang tidak disunat, menuruti hukum agama Yahudi, bukankah Allah menganggapnya sebagai orang yang sudah disunat?

Italian⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Se dunque gl’incirconcisi osservano gli statuti della legge, non sarà la loro incirconcisione reputata circoncisione?

ItalianRiveduta⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ E se l’incirconciso osserva i precetti della legge, la sua incirconcisione non sarà essa reputata circoncisione?

Japanese⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ 割禮なき者も律法の義を守らば、その無割禮は割禮とせらるるにあらずや。

Kabyle⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Win ur neḍhiṛ ara, itebɛen ccariɛa, eɛni ur ițwaḥsab ara ɣer Sidi Ṛebbi am akken yeḍheṛ ?

Korean⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ 그런즉 무할례자가 율법의 제도를 지키면 그 무할례를 할례와 같이 여길 것이 아니냐

Latvian⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Bet ja neapgraizītais izpildītu likuma prasības, vai tad viņa neapgraizīšana neskaitīsies apgraizīšana?

Lithuanian⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Taigi, kai neapipjaustytas žmogus laikosi įstatymo reikalavimų, ar jo neapipjaustymas nebus įskaitytas apipjaustymu?

PBG⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Jeźliby tedy nieobrzezka przestrzegała praw zakonnych, azaż jego nieobrzezka nie będzie przyczyną za obrzezkę?

Portuguese⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Se, pois, a incircuncisão guardar os preceitos da lei, porventura a incircuncisão não será reputada como circuncisão?

Norwegian⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Om altså den uomskårne holder lovens bud, skal da ikke hans forhud bli regnet som omskjærelse?

Romanian⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Dacă deci, cel netăiat împrejur păzeşte poruncile Legii, netăierea lui împrejur nu i se va socoti ea ca o tăiere împrejur?

Ukrainian⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Отож, коли необрізаний зберігає постанови Закону, то чи не порахується його необрізання за обрізання?

UkrainianNT⁽ⁱ⁾ ²⁶ Коли ж необрізаний хоронить установи закону, чи необрізаннє його за обрізаннє не полїчить ся?